Notable Accomplishments Building a Sustainable Local Public Health Workforce Effective public health systems depend on a trained and motivated workforce to carry out the services needed to achieve health goals.
Rather than tackling specific issues, the Fund was set up to be the largest funding mechanism for global health issues and programs, signifying a dramatic break from historical methods of aid allocation as Peris Jones noted in Of gifts and return giftsFrom Disaster to Development?
The Fund is not an implementer and does not impose conditionalities upon recipients, which is a major criticism for many aid disbursements. Instead, its innovation lies in the apparent attempts to promote local ownership and planning.
Countries are asked to identify needs and come up with solutions, which the Fund will finance. However, there have been criticisms about the funds that have been contributed by the wealthiest nations. For example, the two largest donors—U. K—gave million dollars each in the first year.
While it was welcomed at the time, it was also criticized as not enough. You can also listen to this Democracy Now! Christian Aid echos those concerns, but also adds that more fundamentally, the AIDS fund ignores the root causes: Administrative structures are not in place and no money has been disbursed.
The billions needed can only be met by governments increasing their aid budgets. The fund therefore, while perhaps still welcome because we still need to deal with the immediate and massive problem will always be fighting an uphill struggle. Furthermore, there have also been continued concern over issues such as patents, pricing and so on.
Suddenly, the emergence in the South of very low cost generics producers seems credible. The success in the developing world of the southern producers is quite important.
Otherwise there is no real leverage. It is important not to link use of the global fund to purchases from European and US producers, but rather, to permit competition and buy from the firms with the best price that have acceptable quality.
A vivid example of this is in health issues around the world. Amazingly large donations by foundations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are impressive, but the underlying causes of the problems are not addressed, which require political solutions. As Rajshri Dasgupta comments: In a nutshell, industry and private donations are feel-good, short-term interventions and no substitute for the vastly larger, and essentially political, task of bringing health care to more than a billion poor people.
It was big news and very welcome by many. Makes you wonder who the real beneficiary of charity is here. This is just one amongst many examples of what appears extremely welcome philanthropy and charity, but may also not always have other motives.
It might be seen as horrible to criticize such charity, especially on a crucial issue such as AIDS, but that is not the issue. The concern is that while it is welcome that this charity is being provided, at a systemmic level, such charity is unsustainable and shows ulteria motives.
Would Bill Gates have donated that much had there not been additional interests for the company that he had founded? What Palast is hinting towards is the unequal rules of trade and economics that are part of the world system, that has contributed to countries such as most in Africa being unable to address the scourge of AIDS and other problems, even when they want to.
See for example, the sections on free tradepoverty and corporations on this web site for more on this aspect.
Some two years on from the setting up of the Global Fund, and inthe Fund is still facing cash short falls, and growing criticism about the way the U.
This was preceded by a prominent announcement by President Bush in his State of the Union speech. But behind the headlines, the five year plan has come under attack for largely by-passing the Global Fund, precisely set up as a functional and working multilateral program to fight fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.
However, as the international HIV and AIDS charity AVERT criticizes, this allows the US to avoid supporting countries perceived to be hostile, or those who may support programs it currently does not like —such as abortion and condom use, or use of generic drugs.
As above-mentioned Peris Jones also noted, USAID, the US aid agency responsible for enormous amounts of global aid flows and development projects, is finding that its policy is increasingly encroached upon and vulnerable to [a] domestic agenda whereby the Christian Right has been increasingly influential on social issues in controversial ways.
It also showed up Europe to be lagging behind on their commitments too.Multilateral contributions to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria also increased. Donor government funding supports HIV care and treatment, prevention and other services in low- and middle-income countries.
the plutocracy cartel an entrenched global elite of vast wealth has spread its tentacles over the earth wielding extraordinary power over world affairs.
UNDP works to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities through the sustainable development of nations, in more than countries and territories. GBCHealth - A coalition of companies and organizations serving as a hub for business engagement on the world’s most pressing global health issues. The Earth Institute - Columbia University's resource that brings together the people and tools needed to address some of the world's most difficult problems, from climate change and environmental degradation, to poverty, disease and the sustainable use of .
The paper will discuss Global AIDS funding as a global policy which has been established by the world organizations. The paper will also include information regarding the benefits which the stakeholder's have been getting.
Sharing the best in global development research for policy and practice.